April 21st, 2009 by Mo
Original Article by David Nelles
There it goes; Twitter has become a substantially relevant PR tool. Hence, within only few months a number of brands have experienced, how fast a crisis can spread – thanks to this channel of the 140 characters. The American painkillers Motrin had encountered the anger and resentment of few well networked moms. The E-Commerce Gigant Amazon had to experience a hacker attack over Easter, which erased literature offers regarding gay and lesbian themes. And last but not least, the Domino’s pizza delivery service has its share of experience in regard to the short distasteful video of two employees on YouTube. The three cases show that even in the U.S Twitter has definitely become more and more relevant for company’s communication. Yet, how could these three companies avoid the big disaster to their reputation before it even started? Maybe these three tips below can help a little:
Only listening does not suffice
Important is also knowing, who talks about the brand in Twitter, and how badly he/she speaks about the brand and the corresponding company. Therefore, the following few priorities should stand out in foreground:
Priority No. 1 has to be the people who make up the majority of your brand’s customers. And that will be the question for Domino’s as it plots the best plan of response: The pizza chain needs to know not only how many people saw the video but who those people are and how likely they are to be current customers.
A monitoring is not only a quantitative analysis of the relevant brands mentions, but it’s also about the qualitative analysis like the segmentation and the creation of user’s typologies. Only a qualitative analysis ensures an effective potential crisis analysis. Thereby, it’s not only decisive, how often a tweet or retweet comes out but it’s also important, whether the tweet fits into my target group or not.
Don’t hide uncertainty – Transparency is a must
Companies should engage themselves in the discussions with quick and fast manner towards the emerging crisis in Twitter&Co. even if the companies do not actually know, what is happening, just like in the case with Amazon deleting the whole product groups. A short PR statement would only ignite more fire to the unfavorable situation. A transparent answer in Amazon’s case would be to inform users that the mistakes are not known yet and people in charged are doing everything in their power to resolve the problems. Through this kind of behavior, one shows that critical voices in Twitter are being taken seriously and that one does react to the voiced sentiments. This kind of strategy can smooth the situation and best example for it: the action taken by Scott Monty after a notice of one of the Ford fan’s communities:
Monty logged onto Twitter and asked people to hold off: there was “more to the story.” That slowed down commentary. A little later he added, there was counterfeiting of Ford trademark properties involved. That froze the conversation and bought him some time.
“Some time,” in a PR crisis a few years ago used to translate into about four days. Times change. Monty figured he had bought Ford a few hours.
The above example show that through the announcement of the brand alone of something is being done in respect to the circumstances can definitely slow the spread of crisis significantly down.
Exercise precautions and build your own Twitter community
This basic doesn’t only apply for Twitter but it applies as well for the whole area of social media. In case of a crisis, a strong brand community can be a life insurance for the brand.
Strong, emotional brands that have built up years of consumer goodwill seem to be more insulated from long-term hurt. Few consumers judged much-loved Whole Foods when its CEO was caught posting comments on financial sites under a fake name. Another consumer darling, JetBlue, has recovered valiantly from its Valentine’s Day massacre, which left passengers stranded on board on a runway for eight hours.
It appears quite advantageous for brands alone, out of the perspectives of crisis prevention to build a strong community around its brand. An authentic and long lasting dialog with users, and tying customers emotionally to the brand will make sustainable damage of brand reputation very unlikely. Furthermore, a big brand community i.e. a big Twitter followers guarantees a real sense of hearing in the target group of user generated channels. At least, Domino’s Pizza now understood how essential own Twitter community can be.
November 28th, 2008 by Sten Franke
Angry twittering moms can cause serious damage to the company and brands online reputation. The U.S Company Johnson and Johnson got the taste of it recently from a mass of outraged and twittering moms. The creative approach of the marketers on the subject strains caused by a baby carrier/sling and Motrinas the perfect problem solution, were found way too offensive by the majority of moms. After all, for moms, it is more about the undeniable powerful bond of being close to their babies whenever possible and less about sore muscles caused by carrying them.
The storm of outrage started in particular through Twitter and You Tube, where young angered moms exchanged their opinions about the offensive and disrespectful ad. AdvertisingAge gives a short overview about how it all started, from one posting up to masses of protest against the brand:
The beginning of the end for the Motrin push probably came Friday (14.11) night, when Los Angeles blogger Jessica Gottlieb said she was tipped off to the ads and started expressing her outrage over the campaign on Twitter, where she has 1,018 followers…On Saturday (15.11), Katja Presnal (4,221 Twitter followers), a New York blogger and proprietor of online children’s clothing store Skimbaco, collected tweets from offended moms and edited them into a nine-minute video on YouTube titled “Motrin Ad Makes Moms Mad,” which had been viewed 21,000 times as of today.
The Motrin campaign got off on the wrong foot with the wrong bloggers, namely mommy bloggers, which led to an immense danger of the brand’s online reputation in within only 2 days after the campaign kicked off. So basically marketers and PR executives should always keep in mind, to take each posting seriously, because it does not take much of influencer for an issue to end up as a crisis.
This communication crisis of J&J shows that Twitter has become a great a challenge for communicators in the realms of issue and reputation management. No other medium has this kind of online influencer’s concentration.
The marketers responsible for the advertising had no other choice than to pull off the campaign after that PR disaster and issued a public apology to all the offended women.
As I mentioned in my previous posting, most companies take social media as a relevant channel after they fell flat on their nose and not before. So I am quite curious, if in the future J&J would take social media more seriously into their communication efforts.